Mission

Wildlife, Best Management Practices

Massachusetts's proven, scientific, conservation methods which allow for healthy Wildlife and Furbers are under attack by radical protectionists. These protectionists pretend to be helping our Wildlife; but, their methods are changing the public's image of wildlife. More and more of the public, especially, the suburban public, are considering Wildlife as pest instead of our natural resources.

Best Management Practices (BMP's) are intended to inform the public about harvesting equipment and its capturing system which are considered to be the state of the art in animal welfare. Through the use of BMP guidelines, harvesters can continue to play and important role in Wildlife management programs across the United States and a Massachusetts administration code that will allow for vigorous wildlife; a direction plan code for healthy natural resources along with a balance approach to its Solutions.

Management

Our goal is to educate the public about the supervision of our natural resources, known as wildlife. To encourage the public to vote in upcoming elections against the deceptive advertising methods use by highly paid lobbyist who try to convince them that harvesting furbearers is wrong.

Most wildlife species including furbearers produce more young annually than can survive, and a good management programs allow for the harvest of their excess numbers.

Harvesting furbearers keep many decease free because of over population.
Harvesting furbearers allows for organic pet food.
Harvesting furbearers keep our pets from becoming a meal.
Harvesting furbearers helps keep property damage down because of over inhabitants.
Harvesting furbearers allows poor families to feast on organic food.
Harvesting furbearers allows poor families to add additional income to their budget

Public support is critical.

Together we can all make a difference.

A familey enjoying the activity of trapping for beaver under the ice.

Renewable and Non-Renewable

Natural Resources

Jackets, hats, and other garments made with synthetic material hurt the natural world because fake clothing is generally made from petroleum (a non-renewable resource). Synthetic clothing is not consistent with the sustainable use of our environment. Where as, clothing made from wildlife (furbearers) does not hurt the natural world because fur (a renewable resource) maintains a natural environment with no world problems. Furthermore, by using wildlife for clothing, it would give an economic incentive to protect wilderness areas --the key to maintaining healthy wildlife populations.

Conservation authorities support the sustainable use of renewable wildlife resources. Nature produces an abundant wildlife populations. Here are two examples. First, there are probably as many beavers in the United States (Massachusetts) today as when Europeans first arrived. Second, foxes, coyotes and raccoons are more abundant than ever. Both examples are true environmental success stories and it was done without depleting wildlife populations or damaging the natural habitats that sustain them.

True protection of renewable natural resources is using part of what nature provides while nature renews itself. Not using other materials (man-made) that are not renewable and may damage the environment.

P.O.Box 2831, Woburn, MA 01888-1531

Do We or Don't We